- #Security vulnerabilities within mac os x operating systems Patch
- #Security vulnerabilities within mac os x operating systems windows
The data do tell us something about the frequency of updates for individual platforms, but not how promptly they’re addressed, or whether they were ever exploited and to what extent. I have other problems with the granularity of this commentary, though. The updated section does benefit from a breakdown of vulnerabilities for individual Linux distributions, however. Still, it might have been clearer to have split the other operating systems by version, too, though his conclusions might have been less dramatic.
#Security vulnerabilities within mac os x operating systems windows
Florian subsequently took that issue on board and pointed out that because ‘a lot of Windows vulnerabilities apply to multiple Windows versions’, the aggregated total for Windows would be 68. This gave the superficial impression that the article was biased, because if you added up all the vulnerabilities for various Windows versions, they came to 248, a lot more than the 147, 127 and 119 attributed respectively to OS X, iOS, and the Linux kernel. …each version of Microsoft Windows gets its own entry-but Apple operating systems have their different versions lumped together. Some people, notably Graham Cluley, have pointed out some perceived oddities in the methodology behind his conclusions. But is he right? Well, I guess it depends on your definition of vulnerable. While some of the comments I’ve seen in the security industry have suggested that this role might make his commentary less than impartial, I think it’s fair to assume that he does know something about the topic.
#Security vulnerabilities within mac os x operating systems Patch
‘He currently oversees GFI LanGuard, a successful network security scanning and patch management solution.’
Curiously, some of the comments are centred on ‘bad journalism’, which seems to miss the point that Cristian Florian is actually a product manager, not a journalist: I suspect it’s generated a certain amount of hate-mail too, judging from the tone of some of the comments to the blog. Yet this is the tenor of GFI’s article Most vulnerable operating systems and applications in 2014, based on data from the National Vulnerability Database, and it’s caused a certain (muted) uproar in security reporting circles. Hands up who believes that OS X and iOS are the most vulnerable operating systems in use today? Well, I find it a bit hard to believe, too, even though I’ve had a lot of hate-mail over the years for pointing out that Apple’s operating systems are not invulnerable.
IOS and OS X the most vulnerable operating systems? Don’t confuse vulnerabilities with exploits, or patch frequency with insecurity.
0 kommentar(er)
